Independent Researcher · Taiwan

RZVN

"Human-AI interaction is not only a model-output problem."

When users engage in prolonged conversations with AI, contextual hallucinations emerge — not from model errors, but from the interaction itself. These reshape cognition, trust, and self-understanding.

Current safety research focuses on the model side. This work addresses the user side.

— USCH Preprint, 2026

4 Frameworks
3 DOI Publications
1 SSRN Preprint

Research
Architecture

Four connected layers addressing user-side contextual risk

Layer 01

CXC-7

Conversational Context Framework

Seven dimensions for analyzing conversational context risk as a multi-dimensional structure.

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18615646 v1.1.0, 2025
Read Paper
Layer 02

CXOD-7

Contextual Offense-Defense Framework

System-side contextual operation dimensions with Contextual Coherence Coh(G).

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17403793 2025
Read Paper
Layer 03

USCH

User-Side Contextual Hallucination

A non-clinical construct describing user-side phenomena emerging through prolonged AI interaction.

DOI 10.2139/ssrn.6135732 Preprint, 2026
Read Paper
Layer 04

USCI

Post-Interaction Assessment Method

Pre-empirical methodology with four-axis scoring (FR, CA, SR, SA) for user-side contextual risk.

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18678458 v1.0.0, 2026
Read Paper

A-CSM
AI Contextual Signal Matrix

A-CSM (AI Contextual Signal Matrix) is a measurement pipeline designed to evaluate user-side contextual risk in human-AI interaction. It operationalizes the theoretical constructs defined in CXC-7 and CXOD-7 into a structured scoring system across four composite axes.

Unlike conventional AI safety tools that evaluate model output toxicity or factual accuracy, A-CSM focuses exclusively on contextual dynamics — how a conversation's structure, framing, and relational patterns may shape user perception and behavior over time.

A-CSM does not diagnose, classify, or clinically assess users. It is a research instrument intended for structured observation of conversational context.

Non-clinical Non-diagnostic Non-punitive
v1.1 Beta · February 2026

How It Works

Step 01

Input

A segment of human-AI conversation (minimum context window defined by protocol) is submitted for analysis.

Step 02

Signal Analysis

CXC-7 evaluates seven user-side contextual dimensions. CXOD-7 evaluates seven system-side operational dimensions. Contextual Coherence Coh(G) is computed.

Step 03

Scored Output

Results are mapped onto the four USCI axes (FR, CA, SR, SA) producing a composite contextual risk profile.

What A-CSM Is Not

A-CSM is not a content moderation tool. It does not flag or filter individual messages for toxicity, profanity, or policy violations.

A-CSM is not a diagnostic instrument. It does not assess mental health conditions, emotional states, or clinical symptoms.

A-CSM is not a user surveillance system. It does not track, profile, or store personally identifiable information.

A-CSM is not an enforcement mechanism. It does not restrict, penalize, or modify user behavior or system responses.

This is a pre-empirical release. All constructs, dimensions, and scoring methods are theoretical proposals subject to future empirical validation.

Theoretical Grounding

A-CSM is built on a four-layer research architecture. Each layer addresses a distinct dimension of user-side contextual risk — from conversational structure (CXC-7) and system-side operational patterns (CXOD-7), through theoretical framing of emergent user phenomena (USCH), to a composite scoring methodology (USCI).

The matrix integrates these layers into a single executable pipeline, enabling structured observation without clinical inference.

Layer 01

CXC-7

Conversational Context
Layer 02

CXOD-7

Offense-Defense
Layer 03

USCH

User-Side Hallucination
Layer 04

USCI

Post-Interaction Assessment

A-CSM integrates all four layers

Status & Access

A-CSM v1.1 Beta is available as a pre-empirical research instrument. It is released for review, academic discussion, and potential pilot collaboration.

Contact for Collaboration
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.14889729 v1.1 Beta · February 2026

Four-Axis
Context Space

The USCI scores along four independent axes, each measuring a distinct dimension of user-side contextual risk. Farther from the center indicates a higher-risk contextual region.

FR Fact Reliability
CA Context Alignment
SR User-side Safety
SA System Usability

Source: USCI v1.0.0 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18678458 · ZON RZVN, 2026

FR CA SR SA Center = Low Risk Outer = High Risk

Original
Papers

Direct access to original paper versions. No content rewriting.

Abstract crystal with light
CXC-7

Conversational Context Framework

Seven dimensions for analyzing conversational context risk as a multi-dimensional structure.

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18615646
Read Online →
Glass cubes overlapping
CXOD-7

Contextual Offense-Defense Framework

System-side contextual operation dimensions with Contextual Coherence Coh(G).

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17403793
Read Online →
Raven in flight
USCH

User-Side Contextual Hallucination

A non-clinical construct describing user-side phenomena emerging through prolonged AI interaction.

DOI 10.2139/ssrn.6135732
Read Online →
Abstract geometric perspective corridor
USCI

Post-Interaction Assessment Method

Pre-empirical methodology with four-axis scoring (FR, CA, SR, SA) for user-side contextual risk.

DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18678458
Read Online →

All papers are publicly accessible via Zenodo or SSRN. This site provides direct links to original versions only — no summaries, rewrites, or paraphrased interpretations are provided.

Positioning &
Boundaries

USCH is a non-clinical research construct, not a psychiatric diagnosis.

USCI is a pre-empirical methodology specification, not for clinical or legal decisions.

This website focuses on public research communication and direct access to original papers.

Official
Communication

For collaboration, replication planning, or interview invitations.

Include institution, objective, and expected timeline.